<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Shaun Gish - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-23fd4faa" type="application/json"/><link>http://shaungish.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:50:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ajax Vs. Flash/Flex</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/12/ajax-vs-flashflex/#comment-7581288</link><description>Yeah, I have played around with Flash/Flex some time, and are puzzled if I should choose between &lt;br&gt;Jquery - javascript or like actionscript - Flex. Thanks for your advice! I'm going to put Flex on the shelf &lt;br&gt;and continue do my javascript thing which I'm already doing at work and home with great satisfaction. &lt;br&gt;Actually JQuery has made Javascript fun again. It's at a perfect level, you can manually code together&lt;br&gt;what you like, use components if you want and are not forced to use a "finished" component that is &lt;br&gt;impossible to override the basic functionality..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mulkku</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ajax Vs. Flash/Flex</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/12/ajax-vs-flashflex/#comment-6897320</link><description>Hi, I really like your site, nice posts! I would like to give you a free flash banner for you to advertise in other blogs/sites if you need one of course. Anyways great blog!  &lt;a href="http://www.customflashbanner.com" alt="Custom Flash Banner" rel="nofollow"&gt;Flash Banners&lt;/a&gt; Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FlashBanner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Invaluables Tools for Startups | ShaunGish.com</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/23/invaluables-tools-for-startups/#comment-2644768</link><description>Intervals looks really nice... and I like how it allows unlimited client and staff logins... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does it handle recurring invoicing/billing?  or payment online?  Those were the two big reasons we went with freshbooks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gishdog</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Invaluables Tools for Startups | ShaunGish.com</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/23/invaluables-tools-for-startups/#comment-2633566</link><description>Startups should also check out&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.myintervals.com" title="Intervals" rel="nofollow"&gt;Intervals&lt;/a&gt;, a web-based tool&lt;br&gt;for time tracking, task management &amp; project management. It handles the workload of&lt;br&gt;Basecamp and Freshbooks combined, and you only have to login in one place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Apple Picks Which Apps Make It to the App Store | ShaunGish.com</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/17/how-apple-picks-which-apps-make-it-to-the-app-store/#comment-2408720</link><description>that could be just about the funniest thing I've ever seen</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">britg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:22:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ajax Vs. Flash/Flex</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/12/ajax-vs-flashflex/#comment-2384808</link><description>I ran into a situation last night that proves that FLEX has some issues...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a popular wedding management application that allows a wedding&lt;br&gt;photographer to manage their lightboxes and allows their clients to purchase&lt;br&gt;photos.  The app costs $1,200 and it only allows PayPal, Google Checkout or&lt;br&gt;Offline Check as payment options.  If this was a javascript built app it&lt;br&gt;could be extended to allow other payment gateways and plugins for other apps&lt;br&gt;(Flickr import for example) that could extend its usefulness to it's users&lt;br&gt;and extend its lifetime as a product.  Instead, it's a compiled app that&lt;br&gt;does what it does and no more...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gishdog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:33:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ajax Vs. Flash/Flex</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/12/ajax-vs-flashflex/#comment-2384678</link><description>Yeah, I can't imagine building a site from scratch now without the ORM of cake, and the accessibility of YUI CSS and jquery.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's also a mashup world as our recent clients have proven.  No one owns their data anymore!  Applications are built completely ontop of other companies' data - and what's the easiest and fastest way to access that data?  javascript.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">britg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple is the new Microsoft&amp;#8230; in a bad way.</title><link>http://shaungish.com/2008/09/08/apple-is-the-new-microsoft-in-a-bad-way/#comment-2249543</link><description>Yeah, they should either not let apps like 'I am rich' be published or let there be a free for all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">britg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>